RICOCHETS....

On a high gravity mastication of thoughts, I have always seen how contradicting is the essence of philosophy, uttered while on the path to revelation by men purported to have high repute. Just like the law of nature widely believed is the "two faces" of any existing concept/person/thoughts/reality...the ying-yang, the good-bad, and so on...But the picture is yet incomplete without including the unique concept of having a neutral visage for any existing phenonmenon as mentioned in the language of the cosmos, the language of the most ever primitive yet, civilised human being- the Sanskrit.. This language includes a "neutrality" in its conjugation, a neutral gender and so on..This is not like a neutral unbiased existence by itself but rather, a melting point of two extremities. The melting points where boundaries fade, the melting point of two contrasts - like the fauna and flora...like the fungi that is both an beast and a plant!!!..the melting point of two worlds, like the green colour that form when you mix yellow and blue ; and how the green is not a single green but actually a gradient that can be sensibly altered to a variety of green shades.....

I think am deviating from the idea....But now established that ANY philosophy has 2 shades and also a melting point (which exists as a gradient)...And what really is happening is that each one of the human mind involved in religion, vedanta, philosophy, and such similar pursuits, derives a certain "shade" of thought...the shade could be "light" but could be suited for that person,,, but the light shade is yet unsuited for crores of other people as each of us are made of inherently different mind substance and each of us are in varying levels of the spiritual pursuit...So when such pre-conceived thoughts originating from a person totally different and unique from you, how can such thoughts lead you to enlightenment, rather wont it stymie your mind like a mis-fixed jigsaw puzzle piece??? thats exactly the point I like to marshall, each of can (if we desire) listen and read about such philosophies but, we must devise our OWN thought process that is inherently idiosyncratic....idiosyncratic like the design we find in the "keys"- the design scheme that is not repeated else where for safety (unless of course copied by the illegal keymaker!!!thats exaclty the point)... having said this you must not wonder why my concept should actually influence you... the concept can influence, but my thoughts SHOULDNOT...

Like how Einstien commented on asking about what was education according to him (He being an all-time-dumbo at school and an all-time-genius in life)...Einstein quacks, "Education trains the mind to think..." ; meaning education should make you "think" that is, generate new ideas, work on undiscovered and uninvented ideas, and education must not be somethin that jus gives you a gross mental study material that can be mugged up and puked when neccessary... An analogy to this is the topic we are interested in quacking about;;;; Has religion, scriptures, customs, culture, philosophy, and so on (which are nothing but SOME BODY'S ORIGINAL THOUGHTS) spurred the creative philosophical thoughts in the populace...the answer is largely NO, as the populace is still 'largely' doting on someone's words, quoting somebody's thoughts, thereby developing a certain 'mental stymie' exactly at that place in the brain where creativity springs up on the path to realisation of the supreme!!!!

--DiDo